这篇论文分析了AI如何影响人类创造力，提出混合团队表现优于单一团队，探讨了AI与人类创意互补的可能性。
研究人员分析了生成式AI如何改变文化创作与传播。研究指出AI辅助创意能提高单个作品的新颖性，但可能降低整体多样性。人类与AI模型以互补方式搜索创意，混合团队表现优于单一团队。机器发现的解决方案可进入人类文化并持续存在。最终结果取决于组成要素：参与主体、比例及连接方式。
Collective creativity in hybrid societies
Generative AI is changing how cultural artifacts are created and circulated, and with it our understanding of creativity itself. Researchers disagree about whether these tools enrich or impoverish culture, and we argue that much of that disagreement comes from conflating two distinct components of creativity: novelty, a property of single artifacts, and diversity, a property of populations. We argue further that creativity in the context of generative AI is best understood as a property of hybrid collectives, or populations of interacting people and algorithms, rather than of individuals. AI-assisted ideation reliably raises the novelty of individual output while narrowing diversity in the aggregate, but this is not an inevitable consequence of putting machines in the loop. Because humans and models search in complementary ways, mixed groups can outperform and out-diversify groups of either kind alone, and machine-discovered solutions can enter human culture and persist there. What decides the outcome is composition: which agents are present, in what proportion, and how they are connected. The question is no longer whether AI helps or harms creativity, but which mixtures let individual gains accumulate without eroding collective diversity.