论文精选73°

智能体记忆分离框架RD-Forget发布

What Should an Agent Forget? Separating What Is Stored from What Is Used

精选理由

RD-Forget让智能体保留历史知识但避免过时信息干扰,解决了事实更新难题。

研究人员提出RD-Forget框架,分离智能体的存储记忆与使用记忆。该框架通过保留源档案和查询条件化记忆视图,控制历史证据对当前回答的影响。

正文

实验涵盖对话记忆、知识更新、事实整合、长上下文推理和个性化场景,结果显示准确回答与查询相关证据构建及过时替代品控制密切相关。

原文 · arXiv cs.AI

What Should an Agent Forget? Separating What Is Stored from What Is Used

Persistent language agents need stored experience to remain available across time, while each answer requires evidence suited to a particular question. A superseded fact can mislead a current-state answer and still be essential for a historical query. We present RD-Forget, a training-free framework that separates what an agent stores from what it uses. A retained source archive preserves observations, and a query-conditioned memory view controls their influence on the current answer. A frozen language-model curator extracts relevant evidence, groups facts into semantic slots, and preserves the relations needed for multi-hop reasoning. Same-slot replacement links suppress superseded values in current-state contexts, while intent-aware retrieval makes earlier evidence eligible again. A rate-distortion formulation guides construction of the answer-time view within a memory budget. Experiments span conversational memory, knowledge updating, fact consolidation, long-context reasoning, and personalization under a shared answering pipeline. The results associate accurate answers with both query-relevant evidence construction and control over obsolete alternatives. Configurations without forgetting or query conditioning have the largest score deficits, while slot grouping, historical access, and relation preservation contribute complementary functions. Retaining history while selectively controlling its use offers a practical way to accommodate changing facts and future questions.

产业坐标与信源核验

本条情报归属 AITOP「论文」核心追踪栏目。在跨区域产业观察坐标中,该动态直接关联「AI 开发者工具链、Coding Agent 与工程化实践」研究主线,反映出当前技术演进与商业落地的最新风向。涉及核心实体与技术议题包括:RD-Forget、智能体、记忆管理、多跳推理,读者可通过下方标签进入对应专题页查阅历史脉络与关联对比。

信源核验说明:本文原始线索采编自「arXiv cs.AI」(@Yuhang Li, Yuchen Li),经 AITOP 多维评分管线结构化提炼。