论文精选

研究提出对抗扰动下风险敏感强化学习的下界认证方法

Certifying Lower Bounds for Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning under Adversarial State Perturbations

精选理由

这个研究挺有意思,作者解决了RL在对抗环境下的风险认证问题,方法上用了φ-散度松弛,还改进了训练参数的选择,结果也比风险中性训练好。

这篇论文提出了一种新方法,用于在存在对抗性状态扰动时,为风险敏感强化学习(RL)策略提供更可靠的性能下界。作者通过引入φ-散度松弛,将问题转化为凸优化,并提出了一个改进的实验方法来选择训练时的风险规避参数β。实验表明,与风险中性训练相比,风险规避训练能显著提高认证下界,尤其是在更大的扰动预算下。

原文 · arXiv: OpenAI

Certifying Lower Bounds for Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning under Adversarial State Perturbations

Reinforcement learning (RL) agents deployed in real-world environments are often vulnerable to adversarial perturbations in state observations, creating risks in safety-critical applications. Certification methods can improve robustness against adversarial perturbations by providing lower bounds on expected cumulative rewards. Existing certification methods, however, mainly focus on risk-neutral objectives. In this paper, we extend certification methods to risk-sensitive objectives by establishing lower bounds on the exponential utility of cumulative rewards under $l_{p}$-norm-bounded state adversarial perturbations ($1\leq p <\infty$). By introducing a $φ$-divergence relaxation of the perturbation set, we formulate the risk-sensitive certification problem as a convex optimization and derive its dual to obtain a tractable approximation of the certified lower bound. We further propose an empirical method that improves certified lower bounds by selecting the training risk-aversion parameter $β$ independently of the risk level used during evaluation. Experiments on both OpenAI Gym environments and a machine replacement problem show that, compared to risk-neutral training, risk-averse training generally yields policies with higher certified lower bounds, particularly under larger perturbation budgets. Moreover, under both risk-neutral and risk-averse evaluation settings, increasing risk aversion during training leads to non-monotonic certification performance, where certified lower bounds initially improve but eventually decrease due to overly conservative policies.