DolphinBench 基准:用真实任务评估智能体记忆的准确率、成本与延迟
DolphinBench: Mapping the Pareto Frontier of Agent Memory
做智能体记忆的可以看这份新基准:500k token 历史里找信息完成任务,还得报成本和延迟。
arXiv 论文提出 DolphinBench,把记忆评估从问答对错改为直接看智能体完成任务的成败。基准设置 3 个知识工作者 persona,每个积累约 50 万 token 的历史消息,任务必须依赖这些历史才能完成。每个 persona 配 200 个任务,验证方式是带历史运行必须成功、去掉历史运行必须失败。所有提交须同时报告准确率、总成本和延迟,论文据此绘制记忆系统的帕累托前沿,并指出此前没有基准同时覆盖这三项。数据集和评测代码已在 dolphinbench.ai 公开。
DolphinBench: Mapping the Pareto Frontier of Agent Memory
Agents today often take real-world actions that depend on long-term memory and context recall over time. However, most current memory benchmarks are built for a conversational question-answer format, where the question itself signals that some fact must be retrieved, and often which one. Moreover, benchmarks rarely require anything beyond accuracy from submissions, allowing memory systems to make unreasonable cost/time tradeoffs to achieve higher scores. We present DolphinBench, a benchmark that evaluates memory directly through an agent's task completion. DolphinBench includes three knowledge-work personas with roughly 500k tokens of user messages per persona and evaluates agents on tasks that depend on information from that history. We verify all 200 tasks per persona by running an agent with and without the relevant history, requiring success with it and failure without it. Finally, we require all evaluations to report total cost and latency alongside accuracy, which enables us to evaluate agent memory systems holistically. No existing memory benchmark combines all three. The dataset and evaluation code are available at https://dolphinbench.ai.