论文

FDE-Gym 基准:95 个真实交付任务测出 AI 智能体的短板

FDE-Gym: The Last Mile of AI Delivery

精选理由

arXiv 上的新基准 FDE-Gym,拿 95 个真实客户交付任务考 13 个模型配置,最好的模型也只做对 14 个。想知道智能体离真实交付差在哪,看这篇。

论文 FDE-Gym 收录 95 个端到端交付任务,来自 20 个真实客户场景、覆盖 18 个行业,由行业专家改编自实际交付项目。智能体需在模拟客户环境中与脚本化干系人沟通、在类生产系统上动手交付,评分以客户自身业务指标的提升为准,并惩罚过多沟通、试跑和等待。评测涵盖 7 家厂商的 13 个模型配置,最优配置平均分仅 0.56,95 个任务中只完全解决 14 个。即使最优配置在最简单的 23 个任务上拿到了全部关键信息,也只有 10 个任务业务提升达到 0.8 以上,说明发现未明约束是主要瓶颈,但不是唯一瓶颈。

原文 · arXiv cs.AI

FDE-Gym: The Last Mile of AI Delivery

Existing agent benchmarks typically evaluate agents on well-specified tasks defined by issue reports, specifications, or task tickets. Real-world customer delivery is different: forward-deployed engineers (FDEs) must clarify ambiguous requirements, work in live systems, and uncover unstated constraints. We introduce FDE-Gym, a benchmark of 95 end-to-end delivery tasks from 20 customer scenarios across 18 sectors, each adapted by industry experts from real-world delivery projects. In simulated customer environments with scripted stakeholders and modifiable customer systems, agents interact with stakeholders and operate on production-like systems to deliver working solutions. FDE-Gym scores a delivery by how much it improves the customer's own success metric, normalized between 0 (unchanged system) and 1 (reference solution), with penalties for stakeholder interactions (messages, trial runs, and waiting time). An online platform lets humans practice FDE skills under the same grading criteria. We evaluate 13 model configurations from seven providers. In the realistic setting, where unstated constraints must be discovered, the best configuration achieves a mean FDE-Gym score of 0.56 and resolves only 14 of the 95 tasks (a score of at least 0.8 with no incident). Discovering unstated constraints is the primary bottleneck: performance drops sharply when models must uncover them without explicit guidance. Yet information discovery alone does not account for the gap: even on the 23 tasks where the best configuration obtains every key fact from stakeholders, it reaches a normalized business uplift of 0.8 or above on only 10. These results reveal a substantial gap between solving well-specified tasks and delivering effective AI systems for real customers.