KGN 用知识图谱三元组重建降维邻域图,8 项条件 NMI 全面超越 kNN 基线
KG-Neighbor: Knowledge-Guided Neighborhood Construction for Embedding Visualization
做嵌入可视化的人可以看看,它不用标签,靠知识图谱三元组重构邻域图,8 个条件上 NMI 和 LT_2D 都赢了 kNN 基线。
论文提出 Knowledge-Guided Neighborhood Graph Construction(KGN),把每个实例的关系知识表示为知识图谱三元组,以三元组共享度作为成对语义证据调整嵌入距离并重建 top-k 邻域图,全程不使用类别标签。在 8 个文本与图像数据集-编码器条件上,KGN 的最大 NMI 和 LT_2D 均超过对应 kNN 基线,最大增益分别达到 0.68 和 1.35。论文同时引入 IDProfile(IDP),独立评估源内容是否支持分配的类别标签与邻域多数类,以解读残差不匹配。IDP 分析显示最大的下降集中在 Placement Issue 候选上。
KG-Neighbor: Knowledge-Guided Neighborhood Construction for Embedding Visualization
In embedding visualizations, nearby instances are interpreted as semantically related, although neighborhoods derived from input embeddings may not reflect content relationships. Neighborhood-based dimensionality reduction (DR) methods can propagate this limitation by optimizing layouts from embedding-based neighborhood graphs. We propose Knowledge-Guided Neighborhood Graph Construction (KGN), which represents relational knowledge derived from each instance as a set of knowledge graph (KG) triples. It uses the degree of triple sharing as pairwise semantic evidence to adjust embedding distances and reconstruct the top-k neighborhood graph; neither KG extraction nor neighborhood construction uses class labels. We also introduce IDProfile (IDP), which interprets residual mismatches by independently assessing whether the source content supports the assigned class label and the neighborhood-majority class. Across eight text and image dataset-encoder conditions, we characterize KGN over the full guidance-strength sweep and four KG similarity measures. Across this sweep, the maximum NMI and LT_2D each exceed the corresponding kNN baseline in all eight conditions, with the largest gains reaching 0.68 and 1.35, respectively. The gains and the extent of neighborhood reconfiguration vary across conditions and are larger under encoder conditions with lower kNN baseline scores. The IDP analysis shows that the largest reductions are concentrated in Placement Issue candidates, whereas Label Issue and Unresolved Case instances account for a larger share of the remaining review set. These results indicate that KGN can narrow the evaluated gap between embedding-based neighborhoods and content-supported semantic relations, while IDP shows that a residual mismatch should not automatically be interpreted as a projection failure.