论文

Continual-ARC:用 ARC-AGI 三代任务流测试智能体的终身学习能力

Continual-ARC: Measuring Skill Acquisition over a Working Lifetime

精选理由

这个基准把记忆型和权重型学习放进同一条 ARC-AGI 任务流里打分,结论挺扎心:单纯加记忆的 agent harness 还不如缓存演示的笨基线,泛化还是得靠改权重。做长期记忆和智能体框架的人应该看看,它给了可复现的评测管线。

Continual-ARC 是一个基于 ARC-AGI 三代版本构建的终身学习基准,任务不含领域知识,会以休眠间隔后返回新实例,同时持续加入新任务。每个实例上,学习者可以付费获取演示、提交答案或在 harness 内操作,错误提交会消耗反馈预算,最终按预算消耗比例计分。由于学习者可以在实例间保留任意记忆或权重,记忆型与权重型系统首次在同一尺度上比较。

正文

流结束后,学习者被冻结,用见过的任务的新实例测记忆、用未见过的新任务测泛化。实验在 Qwen3.5-9B 和 GLM-5.3 Flash 上运行带/不带持久记忆的 agent harness,与两个提示基线、程序归纳法,以及用 Qwen3.5-9B 模仿 GLM-5.3 Flash 的权重训练对比。结果显示,harness 持久记忆在缺乏专家指引时几乎不改善记忆;多数 harness 方法学习效果甚至低于简单缓存每个任务演示的基线。没有 harness 方法在未见任务上获得增益,而权重型学习有显著提升。

原文 · arXiv cs.LG

Continual-ARC: Measuring Skill Acquisition over a Working Lifetime

Agent harnesses have emerged as a promising mechanism for continual learning, alongside test-time parametric learning. However, the current benchmarks have several limitations: they generally focus on a single applied domain, serve each instance only once, and assume a single family of learner, so memory-based and weight-based systems are rarely compared on the same scale. We propose Continual-ARC, a lifelong stream built from the three ARC-AGI editions, whose tasks need no domain knowledge. The same tasks return after dormant gaps with fresh instances, while new tasks keep arriving. On each instance, the learner may pay for demonstrations, submit answers, or act inside the harness, with retries permitted on incorrect submissions, which are paid for. Each instance is scored based on the share of this feedback budget consumed. Since a learner may keep anything between instances, memory-based and weight-based systems are scored on the same scale. After the stream, the learner is frozen and tested on fresh instances of the tasks it met, which measures memorization, and on unseen tasks, which measures generalization. We run an agent harness with frozen weights, with and without persistence, on Qwen3.5-9B and GLM-5.3 Flash, comparing them with two prompting floors, a program-induction method and Qwen3.5-9B's weights trained to imitate GLM-5.3 Flash. Persistence in the harness generally does not improve memorization unless provided with explicit expert guidance. Most harness-based methods still learn less than a floor that simply caches each task's demonstrations, across all models we tested. No harness-based method gains on unseen tasks, whereas weight-based learning shows substantial gains. This opens the door to future weight-based continual learning that could teach models to drive harnesses in new domains.

产业坐标与信源核验

本条情报归属 AITOP「论文」核心栏目,重点聚焦北美前沿实验室与硅谷科技巨头。在跨区域产业观察坐标中,该动态直接关联「AI 开发者工具链、Coding Agent 与工程化实践」研究主线,反映出当前技术演进与商业落地的最新风向。涉及核心实体与技术议题包括:Continual-ARC、ARC-AGI、Qwen3.5、GLM,读者可通过下方标签进入对应专题页查阅历史脉络与关联对比。

信源核验说明:本文原始线索采编自「arXiv cs.LG」(@Daniel Lenton),经 AITOP 多维评分管线结构化提炼。截至目前,全网已有 2 家独立信源对该事件进行交叉印证与跟进报道(含 ARC Prize 等),属于近期高关注度行业信号。