论文精选73°

PACE框架优化检索增强对话服务

PACE: Perceived-Latency-Aware Cascading Service Routing and Filler Control for QoE-Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Dialogue Serving

精选理由

清华大学提出PACE框架,首次量化填充答案冲突风险,显著提升对话响应速度和效率。

PACE框架通过感知延迟级联服务路由和填充控制,将首次响应感知时间(PTFR)作为QoE目标进行优化。在75k CarQA请求测试中,级联路由将纯LLM的P95 PTFR从0.53秒降至0.29秒。自适应控制器在高负载下质量相同时,PTFR比RAG快2.4倍,达到0.41秒P95。填充控制器减少94%的调用次数,波动感知缓存将过期答案从86%降至0%。

原文 · arXiv cs.AI

PACE: Perceived-Latency-Aware Cascading Service Routing and Filler Control for QoE-Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Dialogue Serving

We present the PACE, a framework for retrieval-augmented dialogue serving that formalizes Perceived Time-to-First-Response (PTFR) as a QoE objective and minimizes it under quality/cost constraints. Unlike prior work on cascaded routing, semantic caching, or adaptive retrieval, PACE jointly controls which answer source composes the response and what fills the waiting window. Deployed on a humanoid-robot sales service, it combines three mechanisms: a load-adaptive cascading router, a joint path-filler controller, and volatility-aware cache admission. On 75k CarQA requests, the cascade halves pure-LLM PTFR at P95 (0.29 vs 0.53s at c16). The adaptive controller reaches 0.41s P95, outperforming RAG by 2.4 times at high load with equal quality. The filler controller cuts calls by 94% with zero conflict. Volatility-aware admission reduces stale answers from 86% to 0%. A gating rule ensures the controller never worse than the baseline, with exposure bounded by one hold period. This is the first quantification of filler-answer conflict risk in deployed services.