AI行业为何强调“失控代理”而非责任缺失？
Gary Marcus说，AI公司喜欢用“失控代理”这个说法，因为它比“开发运营不当的软件”更宽容，还能为失败找借口。
Gary Marcus认为，将AI问题归咎于“失控代理”比“开发运营不当的软件”更利于公司。这种说法既承认了AI的强大，也为无法控制其行为提供了借口。
Why does the AI industry wants you to believe in “rogue agents” when we are really just talking about irresponsibly developed software? Here’s a good theory: neil turkewitz @neilturkewitz @haydenfield @mmitchell_ai @HeidyKhlaaf @tilmanbayer @timnitGebru @emilymbender @GaryMarcus @ChombaBupe @alexhanna Yes, “rogue agent” is infinitely more generous to AI companies than “irresponsibly developed & operated software.” Rogue agent serves multiple functions—including an embrace of its power, & an excuse for failure to control. After all, who can anticipate & control rogue agents? 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 3 🔄 6 ❤️ 35 👀 2626 📊 7 ⚡
