行业多源确认

前 OpenAI 研究员 Nick Cammarata:万亿参数模型大部分神经元已可解释

精选理由

前 OpenAI 研究员自己打脸:当年只能解释 2% 的神经元,现在万亿参数模型大部分都能看懂,这是他在 Goodfire 的第一手观察。

前 OpenAI 研究员 Nick Cammarata 发文称,AI 可解释性进展远超预期。他 2023 年在 OpenAI 主持的自动化可解释性项目只能解释约 1.7%-2% 的神经元,如今在创业公司 Goodfire,借助新工具观察,万亿参数规模模型的绝大部分神经元都可读。他表示许多被视为“缠绕神经元”的著名案例其实是被误解了。

原文 · The Rundown AI

Ex-OpenAI researcher Nick Cammarata says the biggest AI models aren’t the black boxes the field once feared. His 2023 OAI project could explain about 1.7% of a model’s neurons. Now at AI research startup Goodfire, he says most are understandable in models up to trillions of parameters. “I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon.” Nick @nickcammarata interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai's first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren't there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works already-clean.goodfire.com 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 2 🔄 0 ❤️ 3 👀 1677 📊 2 ⚡