论文

DAR-MGSM:首个方言阿拉伯语数学推理基准发布

Benchmarking Arabic Dialects for Math Problems

精选理由

有人在 11 个模型上测了 5 种阿拉伯方言的数学题,发现换成当地文化语境后成绩会掉,做低资源语言评测的可以看看。

研究者推出 DAR-MGSM,首个针对方言阿拉伯语数学推理的人工标注基准,覆盖 5 种主要阿拉伯方言和现代标准阿拉伯语(MSA)。基准包含翻译版与文化本地化版两个平行版本,后者将实体和指称调整为地区变体。团队在 11 个以阿拉伯语为中心和多语言大语言模型上做了评测,结果显示本地化版本上成绩普遍下降,不同模型受影响程度不一。机制可解释性分析发现,同一道题的翻译版和本地化版往往引发不同的内部推理路径,即使总体准确率接近。

原文 · arXiv cs.AI

Benchmarking Arabic Dialects for Math Problems

Mathematical reasoning remains underexplored for low-resource languages, including Dialectal Arabic. To bridge this gap, we introduce the DAR-MGSM (Dialectal Arabic Multilingual Grade School Math) Benchmark, the first manually curated benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning in Dialectal Arabic. DAR-MGSM consists of math word problems (MWPs) requiring multi-step reasoning and covers five major Arabic dialects alongside Modern Standard Arabic (MSA). The benchmark comprises two parallel versions: translated-only and translated & culturally localized. The latter version adapts entities and references to regional varieties. We evaluate eleven Arabic-centric and multilingual large language models on DAR-MGSM. The results show that the performance generally declines on the localized version, highlighting the challenges introduced by culturally grounded adaptations. However, the magnitude of this effect varies across models, with Arabic-centric models exhibiting different levels of sensitivity to localization. A mechanistic interpretability analysis shows that translated and localized variants of the same MWPs often induce distinct internal reasoning trajectories, even when aggregate accuracy remains similar. Overall, our results show that mathematical reasoning performance depends on both linguistic variety and cultural context.