论文

Alpha-TCM:面向中医多模态推理的九层可审计框架

Alpha-TCM: A Nine-Layer Framework for TCM-Guided Multimodal Inference and Structured-Prior Auditing

精选理由

有人把中医四诊数据塞进一个九层可审计 AI 架构,还老实交代了对照实验里哪些指标没赢,读起来挺少见的。

Alpha-TCM 是一个系统设计提案,提出九层架构,覆盖语义定义、多模态采集、质控、带溯源的知识、概率推理、纵向更新、约束决策、语言交互和人类治理,每层都定义信息契约与失败边界。作者用受控合成原型实例化了其中 1-5 层:四个条件高斯编码器分别处理合成舌象、脉波、问诊和文本,由冻结桥接层预测五维合成结果。在 10 组配对种子、4 种训练规模下,上下文知识在 600 和 1,200 例时改善了相对边缘委员会融合的平均绝对误差,但没有超过等信息量的神经对照。结论是低数据合成场景支持上下文结构,而非贝叶斯方法的特有优势,且论文明确声明不涉及中医理论或临床有效性。

原文 · arXiv cs.LG

Alpha-TCM: A Nine-Layer Framework for TCM-Guided Multimodal Inference and Structured-Prior Auditing

Alpha-TCM makes two contributions under a central thesis: auditable systems should separate domain knowledge, case evidence, probabilistic inference, and downstream authority. First, it proposes a nine-layer TCM-oriented architecture covering semantic definitions, multimodal acquisition, quality control, provenance-bearing knowledge, probabilistic inference, longitudinal updating, constrained decisions, language interaction, and human governance. Each layer specifies its information contract, failure boundary, dependencies, and validation status. This is a system-design proposal, not a claim of complete clinical implementation. Second, a controlled synthetic prototype instantiates Layers 1-5 to audit the knowledge-evidence interface. Four conditional-Gaussian encoders process synthetic tongue images, pulse waveforms, inquiry fields, and text, while a frozen bridge predicts a five-dimensional synthetic outcome. A versioned contextual prior is compiled independently of the renderer. Fusion removes duplicated reference-prior information before adding context. Equal-information controls, prior regularization, graded contamination, and structural corruption test contextual benefits, Bayesian specificity, and conflict detection. Across ten paired seeds and four training sizes, contextual knowledge improved mean absolute error over marginal committee fusion at 600 and 1,200 cases, but not over equal-information neural controls. Fully incorrect context harmed performance at every size, while prior effects were inconsistent and conflict scores did not track case-level damage. The results support contextual structure in low-data synthetic settings, not a specifically Bayesian advantage. The prototype establishes no claims about TCM theory or clinical, diagnostic, therapeutic, causal, longitudinal, or transfer validity.