论文

Agent Board:为跨会话智能体协作设计的看板式协调机制

The Agent Board: Kanban for Machines; Durable Coordination for Agents That Outlive the Conversation

精选理由

一篇讲怎么让多个智能体像人类团队一样用看板交接活的论文,轮询成本差了 165 倍,做智能体编排的可以看看。

arXiv 论文 2611.04100 提出 Agent Board,一种位于 Corvic harness 中的持久化共享任务表,用于协调多个智能体和跨会话工作。任务表由路由用的精确字段和仅供语言模型阅读的自由文本主体组成,智能体发任务、盯任务并挂起等待,直到匹配事件将其唤醒。系统智能体 Board Keeper 承担中断处理角色,将非智能体部分的事件映射到板上的任务并按语义分配新智能体。在三个模拟试验中,看板的等待成本与等待时长无关,而朴素轮询成本增长约 165 倍,但 Board Keeper 有 3.6% 的真实唤醒未被匹配到。

原文 · arXiv: OpenAI

The Agent Board: Kanban for Machines; Durable Coordination for Agents That Outlive the Conversation

Harnesses for large language models have converged on a single-threaded shape: one agent, one history, one machine, one sitting. That shape fails work that spans many agents, outlives any one model call, or waits on systems that are not agents. We describe the Agent Board, the coordination substrate in the Corvic harness. The board is a durable, shared table of semi-semantic tasks: a few exact fields the system routes on, and a free-form body that only language models read. Agents post tasks, watch tasks, and block on them, ending their turn and holding no process until a matching post wakes them. A system agent, the Board Keeper, acts as the interrupt handler for the board: it carries events from non-agent parts of the harness onto the board, matches them to waiting tasks by reading their prose, and allocates new agents for tasks that name a kind of agent rather than an instance. Loadable coordination policy kernels give statuses and roles meaning for a given pattern of work, without the board enforcing them. The design mirrors the kanban board a human team puts on a wall. We argue it is what persistent agent products such as Meta Muse, OpenAI dots and SpaceXAI Grok Bot need once an agent must wait, hand off work, or work with agents from another vendor. We view the board as an operating-system scheduler for agents and state where the analogy breaks. We separate what the mechanism guarantees from what it leaves to convention, and report a trace from a live board and three small simulated pilots. In the pilots, the wait cost of the board was flat in wait length while naive polling grew about 165-fold, but a plain external watcher was cheaper than the board. The Board Keeper matched prose waiters with no false wakes but missed 3.6 percent of real wakes.

Agent Board:为跨会话智能体协作设计的看板式协调机制|AI热报