研究刻画磁性图网络方向性失效的结构边界
Reciprocity Can Erase Direction:tructural Boundaries and Controlled Utility of Magnetic Graph Networks
如果你在用磁性图网络处理有向图,这篇把相位何时会丢方向信息的条件讲得很精确,还配了可复现的实验对照。
论文针对基于支撑集的磁性拉普拉斯算子,给出方向性被擦除的精确条件:当观测节点数 m≤k+1 时,Top-k 选择会导致方向信息完全坍缩,稠密支撑则对互惠弧比例有下界约束。作者构造了节点特征相同、振幅对称但标签相反的成对传播例子,证明方向擦除表示存在随机水平上限。在 72 次固定神经网络拟合中,支撑相位在单向环上测试 AUROC 为 1.0000,但在互惠环和完整支撑上降到 0.5000;连续分数相位和真实有向对照在全部设置中保持 1.0000。在公开的 DeepDRiD 开发研究中,连续相位相对零相位的稳健性差异仅 +0.0036(95% 区间 -0.0014 至 +0.0095)。
Reciprocity Can Erase Direction:tructural Boundaries and Controlled Utility of Magnetic Graph Networks
Magnetic graph networks encode direction through phase, but a learned graph can erase the intended directional mechanism before prediction. We characterize this failure for support-based magnetic Laplacians. Exact identities relate imaginary energy and distance from zero phase to amplitude-weighted reciprocity. Top-$k$ selection forces complete collapse when the observed-node count satisfies $m\leq k+1$, and dense support imposes a lower bound on reciprocal-arc fraction. We then construct paired propagation examples with identical node features and symmetric amplitudes but opposite labels, giving a provable chance-level limit for direction-erasing representations. In 72 fixed neural fits, support phase achieved test AUROC 1.0000 on a unilateral ring but 0.5000 on reciprocal ring and complete supports; continuous score phase and a real directed comparator achieved 1.0000 throughout. All models solved the direction-free control. These are oracle-direction mechanism tests, not evidence of learned clinical direction. In the preserved public DeepDRiD development study, continuous phase was active but its robustness difference from zero phase was only $+0.0036$ (descriptive 95\% interval $-0.0014$ to $+0.0095$) on validation patients used for checkpoint selection. The contribution is a structural and experimental framework for distinguishing erased direction from unestablished task utility. It provides a precise circumstance in which magnetic phase preserves useful information, without asserting universal or clinical superiority.