论文

LIPS-PC:为单像素成像学习照明模式,少量测量即可完成分类

LIPS-PC: Learning Illumination Patterns for Single-Pixel Classification

精选理由

单像素成像的新玩法:直接为分类学测量模式,8 次测量顶固定变换 32 次,X 光探伤场景挺实用。

单像素成像中,LIPS-PC 通过端到端学习照明模式,让无空间分辨率的探测器只需少量测量就能输出分类结果,测量算子固定为一个线性矩阵,参数化为对二维离散余弦变换(2D-DCT)的残差修正。研究者在 MNIST、Fashion-MNIST 和真实工业 X 射线焊缝数据集 RIAWELC 上进行评估,采样率覆盖低于 1% 到 12.5%。在 M=8(8 次测量)时,学习到的算子比最好的固定变换在三个数据集上准确率高出 9-15 个百分点。8 次测量的准确率相当于固定变换需要 16-32 次测量才能达到,即同等准确率下节省 2 到 4 倍的测量成本。

原文 · arXiv cs.LG

LIPS-PC: Learning Illumination Patterns for Single-Pixel Classification

In single-pixel (ghost) imaging, known illumination patterns probe an object and a detector with no spatial resolution returns one number per pattern. Each measurement costs acquisition time and photons and, for ionizing probes, contributes to delivered dose. Motivated by automated radiographic defect screening, where a class label suffices, we introduce Learning Illumination Patterns for Single-Pixel Classification (LIPS-PC). The patterns are learned end-to-end while the measurement operator remains one fixed linear matrix, identical for every input. We parameterize it as a residual correction to a two-dimensional discrete cosine transform (2D-DCT), $D=D_{\mathrm{base}}+Δ$, and jointly train the correction and a compact classifier using cross-entropy, without a reconstruction objective. This yields a task-driven linear embedding through optimization. We evaluate LIPS-PC numerically on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST under a controlled protocol, then on RIAWELC, a real industrial X-ray weld-radiograph dataset. Across five budgets, $M\in{8,16,32,64,128}$, corresponding to sampling ratios from below 1% to 12.5%, the learned operator outperforms the best tested fixed transform by 9-15 percentage points at $M=8$ on all three datasets. Its eight-measurement accuracy requires roughly 16-32 measurements with the best fixed transform, indicating a $2\times$ to $4\times$ saving at comparable accuracy. The advantage generally shrinks as $M$ increases, with a small reversal on RIAWELC at higher budgets. These results show that learning what to measure is especially valuable when measurements are scarce.