论文

BEAKER 基准发布:评估多模态模型在自动驾驶化学实验室中的具身能力

BEAKER: An Expert-Curated Benchmark for Embodied Brains in Self-Driving Chemical Laboratories

精选理由

化学实验室自动化的新基准,1000 道专家手工出的题考了 28 个多模态模型,结果发现它们看实验视频还行,真要动手操作就不行了。

BEAKER 是面向自动驾驶化学实验室(SDCL)的专家标注基准,包含 1000 个问答样本,覆盖 11 种图像与视频任务类型,涉及可供性定位、轨迹规划、器材与安全识别、操作步骤推理等。全部题目由化学与具身 AI 专家手工创建和审核,未使用 AI 辅助生成。团队用 BEAKER 测试了 28 个通用、科学、化学与具身方向的 MLLM,结果显示模型能大致跟上视频中的实验流程,但在把动作落到可操作区域和可行轨迹、识别细粒度器材与状态、排列中长度流程步骤方面表现不足。

原文 · arXiv cs.AI

BEAKER: An Expert-Curated Benchmark for Embodied Brains in Self-Driving Chemical Laboratories

Self-Driving Chemical Laboratories (SDCLs) are moving chemical experimentation toward embodied automation, where machines must perceive laboratory scenes, reason about experimental states, and act under physical, procedural, and safety constraints. Although Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly considered as embodied brains for such systems, existing laboratory benchmarks mainly focus on safety, anomaly detection, or general scientific understanding, leaving their execution-oriented embodied capabilities underexplored. To fill this gap, we introduce BEAKER, a Benchmark for evaluating Embodied Actionability, Knowledge, Experimentation, and Reasoning in SDCLs. BEAKER contains 1,000 expert-curated question-answer samples across 11 image and video task types, covering key judgments required for chemical laboratory execution, including affordance grounding, trajectory planning, equipment, state, and safety recognition, apparatus setup, operation and step reasoning, and temporal procedure reasoning. All questions and annotations are manually created and reviewed by chemistry and embodied Artificial Intelligence (AI) experts, without AI-assisted generation or annotation. We evaluate 28 general-purpose, science-oriented, chemistry-specialized, and embodied MLLMs in an offline, single-turn setting. Results show that current models can follow coarse experimental procedures in videos, but still struggle to ground actions into operable regions and feasible trajectories, to recognize fine-grained laboratory apparatus, states, and safety norms, and to order steps in mid-length procedures. BEAKER thus reveals a clear gap between coarse procedural understanding and the precise, action-grounded perception required for laboratory execution, providing a diagnostic benchmark for future MLLMs in SDCLs.