Flex-RSI 基准测试:衡量智能体的递归自我改进能力
Flex-RSI: Benchmarking Recursive Self-Improvement of Frontier Agents
团队给智能体自我改进做了个正经基准,executor 和 improver 分工迭代改自己的 harness,用固定预算对比闭源和开源模型,结论挺有料。
arXiv 论文 Flex-RSI 聚焦智能体的递归自我改进,评测对象是视觉与机器人任务,而非传统答题类基准。每轮运行由 executor 改进解法、improver 修改 harness(提示词、工具、记忆和控制循环),改进只有在留出验证集上得分更高才保留,最终在隐藏测试集上打分。测试覆盖感知、推理、机器人动作、3D 重建等六类任务,涉及闭源与开源权重模型。结果显示:自我改进在智能体自建解法时帮助最大,只记录成败的反馈会拖累开源模型,且在物理稳定性或精确正确性校验严格的任务上开源模型落后最明显。配对实验进一步证实修改 harness 本身对增益有贡献。
Flex-RSI: Benchmarking Recursive Self-Improvement of Frontier Agents
Frontier language models are increasingly deployed as agents, and how well an agent performs depends not only on its model but also on its harness: the prompts, tools, memory, and control loop through which the model acts. When an agent is applied to a new problem, a natural question is whether it can use the feedback of the task to improve the way it works, and not merely its answer. Most existing benchmarks keep the agent's harness fixed and score the solution it produces, or target large-scale model training. We introduce Flex-RSI, a benchmark for the recursive self-improvement of agents on vision and robotics tasks under a fixed budget. In each round, an executor improves the task solution, which is kept only if it scores higher on held-out validation data, and an improver then revises the harness, including the executor and itself. Every run starts from the same general-purpose harness, and the final solution is scored on hidden test data. Evaluating closed-source and open-weight models on tasks spanning perception, reasoning, robot action, 3D reconstruction, visual creation, and infrastructure, we find that self-improvement helps most when the agent builds its own solution, that feedback recording only success or failure holds back open-weight models, and that open-weight models fall furthest behind where outputs must pass strict checks of physical stability or exact correctness. Paired runs further show that editing the harness itself contributes to the gains.