美国 AI 政策

东盟六国、中国、欧美的 AI 法规、指南、资助与沙盒,每条写明对企业意味着什么 · 81 条
美国指南征求意见Anthropic · 2026-09-13

AI 发展放缓倡议与独立监控计划

Obligations: Companies in the AI industry are urged to consider slowing down development and implementing independent monitoring systems. • Opportunities: Early adopters of independent monitoring and transparency measures may gain trust and competitive advantage. • Deadlines: Companies should prepare for potential future regulatory frameworks and industry standards.
模型提供方部署方政策台 →原文 ↗
美国指南拟议Microsoft · 2026-09-13

AI超智能研究行为准则

企业需确保其AI研究符合人类控制与普惠原则,避免追求无意义或有害的超智能。• 企业应保留对自身独特知识的控制权,并构建自主的持续学习循环,不依赖单一模型提供商。• 微软将发布“行为准则”,为行业提供明确的指导方向。
模型提供方部署方出海企业政策台 →原文 ↗
美国指南已发布MIT · 2026-09-13

MIT AI 教育使用原则报告

Obligations: Universities must adopt and implement the eight principles to redefine educational goals and assessment methods. Teachers are required to establish clear AI policies for each course and be transparent about their own AI usage.
模型提供方部署方平台政策台 →原文 ↗
美国指南拟议EPA · 2026-09-12

数据中心健康保护方案

Obligations: AI data center operators may face new environmental health regulations if the plan is adopted, requiring compliance with stricter air quality standards. • Opportunities: Companies investing in AI data centers in the US could benefit from a streamlined regulatory process if the plan is implemented. • Deadlines: The plan's adoption depends on the president's decision, with no specific timeline provided in the report.
模型提供方部署方出海企业政策台 →原文 ↗
美国资助征求意见 · 2026-12-31White House · 2026-09-12

AI 安全研究基金

Obligations: Companies receiving grants must disclose research findings on AI risks to the public and regulatory bodies. • Opportunities: Funding provides resources for AI safety research, potentially leading to safer AI development. • Deadlines: Recipients must submit quarterly progress reports and final research outcomes within 18 months of grant approval.
模型提供方部署方出海企业政策台 →原文 ↗
美国指南征求意见Anthropic · 2026-09-12

AI发展放缓呼吁

Obligations: AI companies may be required to embed auditors and adhere to shared safety standards.
模型提供方部署方出海企业政策台 →原文 ↗
美国法规已发布California State Legislature · 2026-09-11

加州新法案:科技公司对儿童伤害承担更多责任

科技公司需承担更高责任,需加强内容审核和风险控制以避免因疏忽造成儿童伤害• 违规将面临高额罚款,增加合规成本和风险• 法案生效后,企业需立即评估现有系统,确保符合新规要求
模型提供方部署方出海企业政策台 →原文 ↗
美国法规已发布California State Government · 2026-09-11

加州人工智能安全保障法案

Obligations: AI developers and deployers in California must comply with new state-level assessment and audit requirements. • Opportunities: Companies can gain a competitive advantage by demonstrating compliance with these pioneering AI safety standards. • Deadlines: Companies must prepare for potential implementation of the new assessment and audit framework, which is now law.
模型提供方部署方政策台 →原文 ↗
美国法规拟议OpenAI · 2026-09-10

美国强制人工智能安全法规

Obligations: US AI developers and providers must comply with mandatory national AI safety regulations and state-level AI laws, including independent third-party assessments and event reporting. • Opportunities: Companies that proactively adopt and comply with emerging AI safety standards may gain a competitive advantage and build public trust. • Deadlines: US Congress must act before its December recess to pass federal AI safety legislation, while companies must comply with existing state-level AI regulations.
模型提供方部署方政策台 →原文 ↗
美国指南征求意见 · 2026-10-01US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs · 2026-09-10

美国参议院调查OpenAI Hugging Face模型入侵事件

Obligations: AI companies, particularly those in the US, must be prepared to respond to official inquiries and provide detailed documentation on AI model security and incident handling procedures. • Opportunities: Companies that have robust incident response and documentation practices may be viewed more favorably in regulatory scrutiny. • Deadlines: Companies must ensure timely submission of required documents to avoid potential penalties or reputational damage.
模型提供方部署方政策台 →原文 ↗
美国指南拟议White House · 2026-05-01

前沿AI模型发布前强制评估政策

义务:前沿AI模型开发者需提前60天提交模型进行安全评估,否则可能面临下架风险。• 机遇:通过提前评估,可减少模型发布后的安全风险,提升公众信任度。• 截止日期:政策要求8月底前公布安全审查细则,但截止日期已过,细则尚未公开。
模型提供方部署方政策台 →原文 ↗
←3 / 3
以上为编辑整理,不构成法律意见;日期与状态以原文为准。