论文精选

结合合成与真实数据提升低资源历史文字识别精度

Combining Synthetic and Real Data for Low-Resource Historical OCR: A Manchu Case Study

精选理由

这个研究方法很实用,它教我们如何用少量真实历史数据来提升OCR模型的性能,特别是对于像满文这样资源稀缺的语言。

这项研究针对满文(清代主要语言)的OCR问题,通过将60,000张合成数据和20,306张真实历史手稿图片结合训练,使三种预训练视觉语言模型(VLM)的识别准确率从87.4%提升至95.09%-96.28%,而仅用合成数据训练的最高准确率仅为87.92%。

原文 · arXiv cs.LG

Combining Synthetic and Real Data for Low-Resource Historical OCR: A Manchu Case Study

Manchu, now critically endangered, was one of the principal languages of the Qing empire (1636-1912), and its extensive archival record is increasingly digitized but remains difficult to search and analyze at scale. Previous work showed that vision-language models (VLMs) trained only on synthetic Manchu word images can reach 87.4% word accuracy on real Qing manuscripts and prints, leaving a substantial synthetic-to-real gap. This study examines how synthetic and real historical training data should be combined for low-resource OCR. Using 60,000 synthetic and 20,306 real historical word images, we evaluate three pretrained VLMs and a compact convolutional recurrent neural network (CRNN) under four regimes: synthetic-only, real-only, joint synthetic-real, and sequential synthetic-to-real training, following a common checkpoint-selection and archival evaluation protocol. Introducing real training images raises the leading configurations to between 95.09% and 96.28% word accuracy, while no synthetic-only configuration exceeds 87.92%. Synthetic supplementation substantially improves all three VLMs, whereas its marginal effect for the CRNN is sensitive to the training objective. Joint and sequential training yield broadly similar archival accuracy under the tested practical pipelines. A compact CRNN also reaches the leading performance range once real images are available, showing that model scale alone does not determine recognition accuracy. Finally, complementary errors among strong recognizers allow voting to raise accuracy to 98.27% without additional training, while an eighteenth-century Manchu dictionary provides a principled rule for adjudicating disagreements.