安全机器人操控的编程代理新方法
Coding Agents with an Obstacle-Aware Harness for Safe Robot Manipulation
朋友,有个新方法叫SafeHarness,专门解决编程代理让机器人操作时撞到障碍物的问题,效果不错,成功率71.9%,比之前好。
研究团队提出了一种名为SafeHarness的新方法,用于解决编程代理在机器人操控中存在的安全隐患。该方法通过分解操作为路线规划和接触执行两个阶段,并引入障碍物感知机制,使模型能够优先考虑安全约束。在测试中,SafeHarness的作业成功率达到了71.9%,碰撞规避率达到了87.5%,分别比之前的最佳方法高出6.5%和27.0%。
Coding Agents with an Obstacle-Aware Harness for Safe Robot Manipulation
Coding agents have emerged as a promising paradigm for robot manipulation: a language model writes the robot controller as a program, and agents built in this way now operate robots without robot-specific training.Whether this paradigm is also safe, however, has not been asked. We evaluate coding agent under a safety constraint, where each task pairs a manipulation goal with an obstacle the robot must not touch. The agent pursues the goal but collides with the obstacle in most cases, treating task completion as its sole objective while neglecting safety. The agent reasons about the obstacle in its traces, and the prompt already forbids touching it, so neither perception nor instruction is at fault; the fault lies in the planning, where the stated constraint never becomes a priority. By decomposing manipulation into a route phase and a contact-rich moment, we locate the source of the failure. Along the route, the model cannot prioritize the safety constraint, having no notion of a clearing route and none of replanning once a chosen route becomes infeasible. At the contact, it is unaware that contact execution is bounded by the same constraint. To close this gap, we present SafeHarness, which equips the model with two obstacle-aware harnesses that enable it to prioritize the safety constraint. Obstacle-aware route planning grounds the objects as bounding boxes and draws candidate routes over them as sequences of waypoints. The agent then plans a route in advance, verifies it, replans when necessary, and only then executes it. Obstacle-aware contact execution instead selects the contact position so that the contact itself avoids the obstacle. SafeHarness attains 71.9% task success and 87.5% collision avoidance, surpassing the previous SOTA by 6.5% and 27.0%, respectively. These results are $2.3\times$ and $1.5\times$ those of the same agent without harnesses.