行业

Ben Horowitz 借 Databricks CEO 框架分析 AI 快速起飞的四条件

Ben Horowitz on what it would take to actually see an AI "fast takeoff" scenario, using a framework ...

精选理由

a16z 的 Ben Horowitz 拿 Databricks CEO 的四条标准拆解'AI自我加速'的说法,结论是一条都不成立,适合被各种起飞论刷屏的人冷静一下。

Ben Horowitz 在 All-In Podcast 上引用 Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi 的框架,列出 AI 快速起飞的四个条件:每代新模型训练所需 GPU 更少、训练时间更短、准确度更高,且能持续循环。他表示这四条目前一条都没满足,所谓快速起飞的风险纯属理论层面。Ghodsi 补充称 Databricks 已有 90% 以上的软件由 AI 编写,但这并不等于 Bostrom 2014 年设想的超级智能。

图片来源 · a16z
原文 · a16z

Ben Horowitz on what it would take to actually see an AI "fast takeoff" scenario, using a framework ...

Ben Horowitz on what it would take to actually see an AI "fast takeoff" scenario, using a framework from Databricks CEO @alighodsi : 1. Each new model needs far fewer GPUs than the last 2. Each new model takes less time to train 3. Each new model is more accurate than the last 4. It keeps happening, again and again "Zero of those four have been met... We're really talking about a risk that's entirely theoretical at this point." @bhorowitz on @theallinpod Your browser does not support the video tag. 🔗 View on Twitter a16z @a16z Ali Ghodsi of @Databricks on the four conditions that would have to hold for AI to truly improve itself: "The next model requires less resources, less GPUs to train... The second condition: the next model takes less time to train as well. Third, accuracy of the model, the intelligence is increasing. And fourth, we can do the former three again and again and again... All at the same time, not just any of them." "If you just mean that the software is writing itself, we're already there today. Like 90-some percent of the software in Databricks is written by AI. Does it matter if the last few percent is also written by AI? No." "If you're getting these four conditions, then you might get a speed-up where the next model, let's say, takes half amount of time and half the resources, and it is more intelligent... By the way, I don't even know if that necessarily leads you to superintelligence." "A lot of people, their definition is just, 'Hey, if I'm not even coding anymore and it's coding itself'... I think they're conflating, 'Hey, what's my value and is it scary for me?' Versus, 'Hey, that then means we'll get that superintelligence that in 2014 was hypothesized by Bostrom.'" @alighodsi @martin_casado @sarah_wang Your browser does not support the video tag. 🔗 View on Twitter 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 5 🔄 0 ❤️ 15 👀 5677 📊 5 ⚡