OpenAI 发表流体力学论文,证明 Navier-Stokes 方程可能发生爆破
OpenAI 居然发了篇流体方程论文,连数学家都说不一定能想出来,专家正拆解它跟凸积分的区别,好奇的可以看看。
OpenAI 的研究团队发表了一篇关于流体方程的论文,讨论 Navier-Stokes 方程解的非唯一性与爆破现象。数学家 Scott Armstrong 评价称其技术构造在某种程度上可能超出人类独立设计的能力,但仍可被人类理解。评论指出该构造与凸积分相关,但用物理不稳定性生成 Reynolds 应力、构造坍缩光滑涡旋的做法在既有文献中没有先例,与 Albritton–Brué–Colombo 的非唯一性构造及 Córdoba–Martínez-Zoroa 的奇点方法都不同。多个 PDE 专家小组正在研读论文,表示已基本理解其思路。
“On a technical level, the paper is unbelievable, maybe beyond what a human could have come up with but not beyond human understanding” Scott Armstrong @scottnarmstrong Since I'm now blocked by bluey from replying to this thread, I answer here by quote tweet the openAI construction has more to do with convex integration than anything else. In convex integration, the oscillations are typically built by hand and the iteration procedure creates wild weak solutions. The non-uniqueness construction of Albritton–Brué–Colombo used an unstable vortex to split solutions apart. The Córdoba–Martínez-Zoroa singularities amplify vorticity across scales by strain. In the openAI paper, a fluid instability is clever made so that the flow itself generates the oscillations: they grow by drawing energy from the background shear. The Reynolds stress then becomes the force that creates the collapsing smooth vortex. Using a physical instability to create the stress in this way has no precedent, and it is what produces a smooth force rather than a merely rough one. Some on these ideas are in the literature (e.g. Leibovich-Stewartson 1983) but the way they are combined is definitely insane and definitely nowhere in the literature previously. I also don't know of anyone suggesting that convex integration would play a role in the creation of a blow-up solution like this. On a technical level, the paper is unbelievable, maybe beyond what a human could have come up with but not beyond human understanding: there are several different groups of pde experts working on understanding it who say that they more or less understand now. I expect digestions soon td;lr: anyone saying that this OAI result is unsurprising is bullshitting sorry! 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 21 🔄 8 ❤️ 89 👀 10566 📊 21 ⚡
- Nathan Lambert11:19原文