论文

基于不确定性评估的 SOTIF 分析:LiDAR 目标检测性能阈值跨工况适用性测试

Uncertainty Evaluation to Support Safety of the Intended Functionality Analysis for Determining the Applicability of Performance Targets Across Triggering Conditions in ML-Based LiDAR Object Detection

精选理由

KITTI、nuScenes 上的 PointPillars 实验,讲清楚一个阈值换个工况就不可靠的问题,做自动驾驶感知安全的可以看看这套检验流程。

论文针对 ISO 21448 定义的 SOTIF(预期功能安全)分析,研究 ML LiDAR 目标检测器在某一触发工况下选定的不确定性阈值能否推广到其他工况。方法是将阈值迁移到新工况后,用统计检验以设定的错误概率判定性能目标在该工况下是否适用、不适用或无法判定,并给出所需独立统计单元的下界。在 KITTI 和 nuScenes 上测试 PointPillars 集成模型时,按记录序列计数,两个数据集的独立单元都不足以支撑任何目标限值;按帧计数则在远距离、雨天以及两个独立训练的检测器之间的迁移中得到不适用结论,此时阈值拒绝掉了大部分正确检测。

原文 · arXiv cs.LG

Uncertainty Evaluation to Support Safety of the Intended Functionality Analysis for Determining the Applicability of Performance Targets Across Triggering Conditions in ML-Based LiDAR Object Detection

For safety of the intended functionality (SOTIF) analysis according to ISO 21448, a machine learning object detector for light detection and ranging (LiDAR) point clouds can meet a performance target, a limit on the mean per-frame share of wrong detections among accepted detections, by rejecting detections above an uncertainty threshold. A threshold selected on data of one condition carries a statistical guarantee only for data distributed like its selection data, whereas SOTIF analysis covers every triggering condition. This paper presents an uncertainty evaluation in which the threshold is transferred into a triggering condition, a test decides at a stated error probability whether the target is applicable there, not applicable or not determined, and a lower bound counts the independent units an applicable outcome requires. For PointPillars ensembles on KITTI and nuScenes, counted in recorded sequences, as the dependence between frames requires, neither dataset held enough independent units for any target limit, and no transfer had a not applicable outcome. Counted in frames, the same data gave not applicable outcomes at limits fixed in advance after transfers into far distance, into rain and between two separately trained detectors, thresholds that met the target limit after a transfer rejected most correct detections, and in rain the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve did not decrease. A performance target met under one condition therefore counts as evidence under a triggering condition only after a test there, reported with its share of accepted correct detections and its number of independent recorded sequences.