论文精选

Embodied-BenchForge:一种闭环代理工作流用于构建具身化基准

Embodied-BenchForge: A Closed-Loop Agentic Workflow for Embodied Benchmark Construction

精选理由

这是 AI 研究者会关注的论文,介绍了如何用代理工作流自动构建具身化基准,对评估模型在真实世界场景下的能力很有参考价值。

本文提出 Embodied-BenchForge 框架,用于自动化构建具身化基准。该框架将用户指定的评估意图转化为完整的基准 artifacts,通过技能编排和依赖图记录中间输出,并应用需求引导的验证和修复机制,确保基准质量。它构建了覆盖多种场景的六个基准,并包含 220 个可执行任务的交互式基准,用于评估多模态语言模型和具身化代理的能力。

原文 · arXiv cs.AI

Embodied-BenchForge: A Closed-Loop Agentic Workflow for Embodied Benchmark Construction

Agentic systems offer a promising way to automate embodied benchmark construction, but existing approaches typically cover isolated stages or remain specialized to predefined environments and task families. More importantly, multi-step construction produces dependent intermediate artifacts that are often passed downstream without artifact-specific verification, allowing local defects to propagate into the final benchmark. We present Embodied-BenchForge, an agentic framework that transforms user-specified evaluation intents into complete embodied benchmark artifacts. It formulates construction as Closed-Loop Benchmark Synthesis, integrating forward artifact synthesis with backward verification and repair. Skill-Orchestrated Artifact Synthesis composes typed and reusable skills into executable workflows, while an artifact dependency graph records intermediate outputs and their dependencies. Requirement-Guided Verification and Repair applies artifact-specific contracts throughout construction and uses provenance to trigger local re-execution or upstream rollback when verification fails. Embodied-BenchForge constructs six benchmarks covering diverse embodied scenarios in the Offline EQA Track, together with one interactive benchmark containing 220 executable tasks in the Interactive Embodied Track. Evaluations of representative MLLMs and embodied agents show that the benchmarks distinguish model capabilities in both observation-based understanding and closed-loop execution. Quality assessment and ablations validate benchmark quality and the effectiveness of verification and repair, while repair and skill-reuse analyses demonstrate efficient localized recovery and cross-benchmark reusability.