五角大楼与 Anthropic 的争端焦点：军方使用 AI 时谁拥有最终决定权
精选理由
五角大楼和 Anthropic 掰腕子了，争的是 AI 进军事场景后到底听谁的，双方理由都很硬核。
美国国防部与 Anthropic 的分歧核心在于 AI 用于军事时的最终决定权归属。国防部 CTO Michael Guetlein 表示，若模型夹在指挥官与上级之间拒绝执行指令，这在军队中行不通。他认为让模型凌驾于公司创始人之上本身就意味着失控。这场争论触及军方部署 AI 的权限边界问题。
原文 · The Information
The Pentagon's dispute with Anthropic comes down to a fundamental question: Who gets the final say when AI is used by the military?
@DeptofWar CTO @USWREMichael: “If you don't want humans to lose control, you can't give models the control over humans. And that whole notion that a model has feelings and it can overrule the founders of a company is by definition loss of control.”
“If a model gets in between one commander and their superior and says, well, I don't like what you say despite your commander saying it, that doesn't work in the military.”
