微软发布 SEMA-Auto:自动多轮越狱攻击框架
SEMA-Auto: Sighted and Efficient Multi-Turn Attack with Autonomy
微软这篇论文做了个自动越狱攻击器,对 GPT-5.4、Claude-Haiku-4.5 这些模型的攻击成功率近六成,做 AI 安全的得看看对手手段。
微软研究团队提出 SEMA-Auto,一个能自主与受害模型多轮交互并在成功后自行终止的越狱攻击框架。该框架采用两阶段训练:先用合成引导轨迹微调建立攻击目标概念,再通过决策监督强化学习同时优化攻击成功率与每轮决策。在 AdvBench 上对 DeepSeek-V4-Flash 达到 76.0% 的 ASR@1,平均仅需 3.0 轮,而最好的静态基线为 54.8%、交互式基线为 43.8%。对 GPT-oss-120B、GPT-5.4、Claude-Haiku-4.5、GPT-6-Astra 等安全加固模型,在 HarmBench 上平均取得 59.6% ASR@1,超过此前 SOTA 13.8 个百分点。
SEMA-Auto: Sighted and Efficient Multi-Turn Attack with Autonomy
Existing jailbreak attackers fall into two classes: static planners fix their single- or multi-turn adversarial plans in advance, remaining simple but losing sight of the victim's replies, wasting turns and limiting transferability; interactive generators read each victim reply to generate the next-turn attack but require in-loop evaluators for success signals or hints, incurring substantial costs and inflated performance. Bridging this gap, we propose SEMA-Auto, a sighted and efficient multi-turn attacker with autonomy, interacting with the victim model and terminating the session by itself upon success. To stabilize its behaviors and boost its capabilities, SEMA-Auto is trained in two stages. Synthetic bootstrap tuning installs the notion of attack targets and conforming decisions by fine-tuning the base model with bootstrapped trajectories. Decision-supervised reinforcement learning then optimizes two objectives jointly yet separately, reinforcing the attack with higher jailbreak reward while supervising the decision at each turn against an absolute target. Our method achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) attack success rates (ASR) across multiple datasets, victims, and judges, outperforming all static and interactive baselines, within almost the fewest turns, demonstrating both effectiveness and efficiency. For example, SEMA-Auto performs a $76.0\%$ ASR@1 within an average of $3.0$ turns against DeepSeek-V4-Flash on AdvBench, while the best static baseline is $54.8\%$ with fixed $7$ turns and the best interactive baseline is $43.8\%$ in $3.7$ turns. Against safety-hardened frontier models, GPT-oss-120B, GPT-5.4, Claude-Haiku-4.5, and GPT-6-Astra, our counter-trained attacker achieves an average $59.6\%$ ASR@1 on HarmBench, $13.8\%$ over prior SOTA. Our code is available at: https://github.com/microsoft/SEMA