微软研究院论文：共享进度的多智能体团队可用更少数量追平独立智能体
Banger paper from Microsoft Research and colleagues. It studies the potential benefits of agents th...
微软研究院的新论文，几个智能体往共享目录写进度就能顶4倍数量单干，ARC-AGI-3上的数据很扎实
Microsoft Research 与合作者发布论文，研究智能体在工作中共享进度的收益。实验中智能体没有预设角色，通过共享目录交流发现。结果显示 k 个智能体的团队在 ARC-AGI-3 上的成功率能追平 4k 个独立工作的智能体，且差距随 k 增大而扩大。该团队配置在 polyomino packing 任务上超过 best@k 并刷新此前最好成绩，在 MNIST 压缩任务上四智能体团队写出 1,957 字节、测试准确率 99.4% 的分类器，比已知最好的人工方案更小。论文同时指出当算力紧张或缺乏清晰进度指标时，独立智能体表现更好。
Banger paper from Microsoft Research and colleagues. It studies the potential benefits of agents th...
Banger paper from Microsoft Research and colleagues. It studies the potential benefits of agents that share progress while they work. (bookmark it) Communication is still a challenge with multi-agent systems. In this setup, agents have no predefined roles and communicate via a shared directory. They report that a team of k agents that write their findings to a shared directory matches the success rate of 4k agents working independently on ARC-AGI-3. The gap grows with k, and teams reliably solve some tasks that no single agent solves. The same setup beat best @k on polyomino packing and exceeded the prior best-known score. On MNIST compression, a four-agent team wrote a 1,957-byte classifier with 99.4% test accuracy, smaller than the best-known human solution. Independent agents still do better when compute is tight or when there is no clear measure of progress, so the paper also tells you when it might be a good idea to skip communication. Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.21032 Chat with Paper: academy.dair.ai/papers/scaling… 💬 11 🔄 6 ❤️ 36 👀 3074 📊 18 ⚡
