Vinod Khosla 称开源模型成本高、风险大，建议美中达成开源监管条约
Khosla 接受 WSJ 采访时说开源太贵又太危险，建议白宫跟中国签条约管住开源模型，观点挺有争议，可以看看他怎么论证的。
Vinod Khosla 在接受 WSJ 采访时表示，相比闭源模型，开源模型运行成本更高，危险性也更大。他称已向 David Sacks 和白宫建议，由美中两国签订条约，将开源模型限制在经过认证的云环境内运行，防止个人利用模型设计恶意病毒。他认为 OpenAI、Anthropic、Google 等闭源厂商能追踪用户用途，而开源模型可在任意环境部署，无法保证安全护栏持续生效。
Vinod Khosla on open source models on his new interview with WSJ
"There’s a lot of misperceptions about open source.
Open source is way too expensive to run compared to closed source models. Open source is way more dangerous than closed source.
In fact, it’s the one area I’ve recommended to David Sacks and the White House generally to do a treaty with China. You can’t trust China, but it’s one area where constraining open source to not be able to do wild things, like design another bad virus, is in the mutual interest of both the US and China.
I think because it’s in both parties’ interest to not have models go wild in what they can do in the hands of individuals. This is not just a nation state thing. An individual at home could design a bad virus and release it. And so, it’s in both parties’ interest to not have that happen. In open source, it’s very easy to do.
In closed source, you know, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google know what’s going on, what people are using their models for. So you try and do something bad with their models, they know. Open source, you can run anywhere. So there’s no way to prevent the safety and harnessing to be kept in place.
So if you constrain where open source runs, on certified clouds where, you know, they can’t be used for certain bad purposes, that can be done both in the US and China and everywhere else.
---- Full video on "WSJ Events" YouTube channel, (link in comment)
