Meta 发布六篇论文：数学家与 Muse Spark 1.1/1.2 协作求解开放数学问题
Meta 让数学家用 Muse Spark 的普通聊天界面做开放数学题，还发了六篇论文，每篇都标注人和 AI 各写了哪部分。
Meta 宣布其模型在数学、物理、化学五项竞赛中达到金牌水平后，进一步测试 AI 能否参与真正无既有解法的开放问题。数学家通过 meta.ai 普通聊天界面使用 Muse Spark 1.1 和 Muse Spark 1.2 的 Thinking Mode，未搭建定制研究工具链，历时数月完成合作。每篇论文标注哪些段落主要由人类或 AI 撰写，并由第二组数学家独立审阅。Meta 此次共发布六篇论文。
Following gold-medal-level performance from our AI models across five competitions in mathematics, physics, and chemistry, we asked a harder question: can AI contribute when a problem is genuinely open and without an existing solution path? Over the past several months, mathematicians worked with Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 in Thinking Mode through the regular meta.ai chat interface, with no custom research scaffold, to find solutions to such problems. Our goal wasn't to mass-produce papers, but empower researchers. Every collaboration followed the same principles: mathematicians guided the research, a second group of mathematicians then reviewed the work, each paper marks which passages were drafted primarily by humans or AI, and each credits the prior research it builds on. Where other teams independently announced solutions to the same problems, we acknowledge their work as well. Today, we're sharing six papers from that collaboration. 🧵👇 💬 67 🔄 120 ❤️ 978 👀 271021 📊 222 ⚡
