Opus 5.5和GPT-6 Luna提升性价比

https://t.co/JShi5F3878

x.com/pwendell/statu… Patrick Wendell @pwendell Crazy few weeks for model releases! Our findings @Databricks show several new models meaningfully advance the pareto frontier. Results below (online workload analysis of N=2,400 engineers, plus offline evals): 1. Two of the three models released last week clearly expand the cost/quality frontier: Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna. 2. Opus 5.5 is now the highest quality mid-tier model. It is better than all prior Opus models, better than GPT-6 Sol, and better than GPT-5.6 Sol. 3. Opus 5.5 reduces same-task costs consistently by 20% in both offline and online analysis. This is against a baseline of Opus 4.8, the prior least-cost Opus model (Opus 5.0 was a bit of a dud with high costs and barely noticeable quality improvements). 4. Due to best-in-class quality and lower costs, Opus 5.5 is a strong candidate as an “every day default” model for coding, and we are now encouraging it for this purpose at Databricks. 5. GPT-6 Luna is very, very, very cheap. It was at least 20 times cheaper per-task than Opus 5.5 in every offline benchmark we tested and in observed online use. 6. GPT-6 Luna is surprisingly capable given how cheap it is. On one of our most difficult evaluation suites it roughly matches Opus 4.6 performance, while being 99.3% cheaper per-task than Opus 4.6 was at that time. That's a 100X cost reduction in ~9 months! This finding is preliminary and we are still evaluating Luna quality on a broader set of offline and online tests. Our production setup: Unity Gateway to route workloads across models and trace agentic interactions. A mix of end-user harnesses including: Omingent (meta-harness), Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 0 🔄 0 ❤️ 0 👀 150 ⚡